The Hawaii Clipper Crew of Trip #229 (taken from the official CAA Investigation):
The Captain, Leo Terletzky, held a current and appropriate Federal Pilot’s Certificate of Competency, and the required rations for the flight involved. His list physical examination as required by the Department of Commerce was taken on April 20, 1938, with a subsequent physical examination taken on July 21, 1938, in conformity with Company regulations for all flight personal, both of which showed him to be in satisfactory physical condition. Captain Terletzky’s record indicates that he had a total of 9,200 hours flying experience, of which 1626 hours had been in Trans-Pacific operation. His total flying experience in the Martin, Model 130 Flying Boat, was 1614 hours. His total flying time in the preceding year was 826 hours, and his flying time in the month preceding the start of the subject trip was 6 hours.
First Officer Mark A. Walker held a current and appropriate Federal Pilot’s Certificate of Competency, and the required ratings for the flight involved. His last physical examination as required by the Department of Commerce was taken on February 28, 1938, with a subsequent physical examination taken on July 21, 1938, in conformity with Company regulations for all flight personnel, both of which showed him to be in satisfactory physical condition. His record showed that he had a total of over 1900 hours flying experience, 1575 hours of which had been in Trans-Pacific operation.
Second Officer George M. Davis held a current and appropriate Federal Pilot’s Certificate of Competency (License), and the required ratings for the flight involved. His last physical examination as required by the Department of Commerce was taken on February 14, 1938, with a subsequent physical examination taken on July 21, 1938, in conformity with Company regulations for all flight personnel, both of which showed him to be in satisfactory physical condition. Pilot Davis’ record showed that he had a total of 1650 hours flying experience, 1080 hours of which had been in Trans-Pacific operation.
Third Officer Jose M. Sauceda held a current and appropriate Federal Pilot’s Certificate of Competency (License), and the required ratings for the flight involved. His last physical examination as required by the Department of Commerce was taken on January 7, 1938, with a subsequent physical examination taken on July 21, 1938, in conformity with Company regulations for all flight personnel, both of which showed him to be in satisfactory physical condition. His record showed that he had a total of 1900 hours flying experience, 570 hours of which had been in Trans-Pacific operation.
Fourth Officer John W. Jewett held a current and appropriate Federal Pilot’s Certificate of Competency, and the required ratings for the flight involved. His last physical examination as required by the Department of Commerce was taken on June 23, 1938, with a subsequent physical examination taken on July 21, 1938, in conformity with Company regulations for all flight personnel, both of which showed him to be in satisfactory physical condition. His record showed that he had a total of 2000 hours flying experience, hours of which had been in trans-Pacific operation.
Engineer Officer Howard L. Cox held a current and appropriate Federal Pilot’s Certificate of Competency, and the required ratings for the flight involved. His last physical examination, taken on July 21, 1938, in conformity with Company regulations for all flight personnel, showed him to be in satisfactory physical condition. His record showed that he had over 944 hours flying experience in trans-Pacific operation.
Assistant Engineer Officer T. B. Tatum held a current and appreciated. Federal Aircraft Mechanic’s Certificate of Competency. He had boarded the aircraft at Honolulu and was on a training flight.
Radio Officer William McGarty held a federal Radio license, First Class. His last physical examination, taken on July 21, 1938, in conformity with Company regulations for all flight personnel, showed him to be in satisfactory physical condition. His record showed that he had 1952 hours radio experience in trans-Pacific operation.
The Flight Steward was Ivan Parker. His last physical examination, taken on July 21, 1938, in conformity with Company regulations for all flight personnel, showed him to be in satisfactory physical condition. His record showed that he had 1200 hours flying experience in trans-Pacific operation.
Passengers aboard Trip# 229:
Edward E. Wyman, 15 Edgewood lane, Bronxville, New York
K. A. Kennedy, 2534 Mountain Boulevard, Oakland, California
Dr. Earl E. McKinley, 2101 Connecticut Ave., Washington, D. C.
Fred C. Meier, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington D. C.
Major Howard French, 2560 North East 30th Ave., Portland
Wah Sun “Watson” Choy, 2929 Hudson Boulevard, Jersey City, N. J.
The Civil Aeronautics Authority Investigation:
PRELIMINARY REPORT OF INVESTIGATION OF THE DISAPPEARANCE OF AN AIRCRAFT OF PAN AMERICAN AIRWAYS, INCORPORATED, IN THE VICINITY OF LATITUDE 12 DEGREE 27′ NORTH, LONGITUDE 130 DEGREE 40′ EAST, (BETWEEN GUAM AND MANILA) ON JULY 29, 1938.
In an order dated August 17, 1938, issued by the Secretary of Commerce, pursuant to the provisions of the Air Commerce Act of 1926. as amended, R. D. Royt, Aeronautical Inspector, Phil C. Salzman, airline Maintenance Inspector, and W. T. Miller, Airways Superintendent, Intentional Section, were designated as a Board to investigate the facts, conditions and circumstances surrounding the disappearance of the Hawaii Clipper, an aircraft of Pan American Airways, Incorporated, while flying westbound between Gums and Manila, P. I., on July 28, 1938, and to make a report thereon. Colonel Sumpter Smith and Mr. Thomas O. Hardin of Washington, D. C., were designated as advisory members of the Board.
The Board convened at Alameda, California, on August 18, 1938, and promptly instituted an investigation. After a preliminary survey, the Board deemed it inadvisable to hold a public hearing at the time and a report to that effect was made to the Secretary of Commerce.
Thereupon the Secretary of Commerce directed that the Board be relived of that duty, and directed that it continue the investigation and deliver its report of such investigation to the Air safety Board of the Civil Aeronautics Authority, as part of the records of the Department of Commerce transferred to the Civil Aeronautic Authority pursuant to Executive Order 7959 dated August 22, 1938.
The Board, therefore, proceeded with the investigation and reports as follows:
On July 29, 1938, at 0411, Greenwich Civil Time, the Captain of the Hawaii Clipper, an aircraft of Pan American Airways, Incorporated, flying westbound between Guam and Manila, P. I., in regular scheduled foreign air commerce, sent a routine radio position report giving their 0400 O.C.T. position as being Latitude 12 degree 27′ North, Longitude 130 degree 40′ East. This position is approximately 582 nautical miles east-southeast of Manila. The position report was received by the radio operator at Panay, P. I., who was at that time standing radio guard over the operation. The ground station acknowledged this report and requested the Clipper to stand by for a routine weather sequence report. The radio operator at Panay was unable to obtain acknowledgement of messages sent the clipper, and since that date no reasonable explanation for its disappearance has been found.
The date and time mentioned above correspond to 12:11 P.M. of July 29th, Local Time at Manila, P. I., and 11:11 P.M. of July 28th, Eastern Standard Time. At the time of the aircraft’s disappearance, it was being flown in scheduled foreign air commerce under a letter of Authority dated September 19, 1936, and carried passengers, mail and express. The crew consisted of the Captain, First Officer, Second Officer, Third Officer, Fourth Officer, Engineer Officer, Assistant Engineer Officer, Radio Officer and Flight Steward.
The total flying time of the Hawaii Clipper prior to journey from Alameda on Trip No. 229 was 4751:55 hours. It had flown an additional 55:58 hours when last reported between Guam and Manila. The operation and maintenance history of this aircraft has been normal in all respects in comparison with other flying boats operated by the Pan American Airways Company between San Francisco and Manila.
The trip in question was scheduled from Alameda, California, to Manila, P. I. Departure from Alameda was made on July 23, 1938, the flight arriving at Honolulu on July 24th. On July 25th the trip was continued from Honolulu to Midway on schedule, arriving there July 26th, A Scheduled departure was made from Midway on July 26th and the flight arrived at Wake on July 27th. It departed from wake on July 27th and arrived at 0555 G. C. T. on July 28th. Departure from Guam was made at 1938 G. C. T. (3:39 A.M. Manila Time) on July 28, 1938, the aircraft actually leaving the water 29 minutes later. Sunset at Manila, the destination, was at 2:29 P.M., Manila Time, thus giving 14 hours and 50 minutes of daylight for the flight. The flight time analysis indicated that in standard cruising at a density altitude f 7800 feet, the flight would take 12 hours 30 minutes. There were 2550 gallons of gasoline on board, and 120 gallons of oil. This amount of gasoline was calculated to provide a cruising endurance of 17 hours and 30 minutes at cruising R. P. M. under the conditions stated above. The aircraft carried six passengers, 1138 pounds of cargo, and was loaded to a gross weight of 49, 894 pounds at the time of takeoff.
At 0330 G. C. T., 41 minutes before the last radio contact, there remained aboard the aircraft 1420 gallons of gasoline which is sufficient for 10.1 hours of normal cruising. This would indicate that there was ample fuel aboard to reach Manila and continue the flight for several hours thereafter.
The records show that the trip from Alameda to Guam was uneventful. Weather conditions were better than average, and each leg of the trip was accomplished on schedule. Between Midway and Wake, the course followed was considerably to the South of the regular route due to had weather along the route and to the north. This procedure is normal, as regular alternate routs are laid out for each leg of the Pacific operation. The route selected for any trip is based on weather forecasts made prior to departure, and may be changed en route at the discretion of the Captain. The records also show that the ordinary routine radio contacts were maintained between the aircraft and the shore stations on guard on such lag of the trip. Company procedure requires that a constant guard be maintained by radio stations at the point of departure and destination, at all times while the aircraft is in flight.
Prior to departure from Alameda, the aircraft was inspected, and routine service procedure, known as “long airplane service” and “long engine service” was carried out. The “shore run up report” and engineering flight-tests showed satisfactory operation. The Company’s routine procedure calls for a test flight of at least three hours on the day preceding departure from Alameda. This flight is conducted by the same crew scheduled to make the trip. During this flight an emergency landing is made and an “abandon ship” drill is carried out. This drill consists of inflating the left raft and getting it over-side, with the crew, emergency equipment and nations aboard. An emergency radio is set up and communication with shore stations is established. All members of the crew have a definite assignment during this maneuver. During over-night stops at Honolulu, Midway, make and Guam the aircraft was services and inspected in accordance with routine procedure, which calls for “over-night airplane service” and “over-night engine service”. The former requires inspection of vital parts and the addition of fuel, oil, waste and auxiliary fluids. The latter requires a detailed inspection of the engines, and their controls and installations. No significant irregularities were reported by the Flight Engineer or detected by the respective airport Chief Mechanics.
At Wake Island, the Hawaii Clipper met the Philippine Clipper, which was eastbound, both aircraft making a scheduled overnight stop at that point. Testimony from members of the crew of the Philippine Clipper indicates that the entire crew of the Hawaii Clipper were in the best of spirits and that the reported a comfortable and normal trip up to that time. The trip weather forecast, prepared at 1322 G. C. T., July 28, on the basic of which the aircraft was dispatched from Guam, was nothing out of the ordinary.
Radio facilities at Guam consist of a Company Station KMBC. Other stations standing guard on the operation between Guam and Manila were Panay KZDY and Manila KZBQ. In addition, other Pan American Airways radio stations in the Philippine Islands were standing watch. The aircraft was equipped with two independent transmitters, either of which could be used for communicating on assigned frequencies or on the international distress frequency of 500 kilocycles. Radio communication was maintained in a normal manner up to 0411 G. C. T. At that time a routine report was sent by the Clipper giving their position at 0400 G. C. T. (12 Noon Manila Time). The message was as follows (a13 communications are in code and message quoted are interpretations):
“Flying in rough air at 9100 feet. Temperature 13 degree centigrade. Wind 19 knots per hour from 247 degree. Position Latitude 12 degree 27′ N. Longitude 130 degree 40′ E dead reckoning. Ground speed made good 112 knots. Desired track 282 degree, Rain. During past hour cloud conditions have varied. 10/10ths of sky above covered by strato-cumulus clouds, base 9200 feet. Clouds below, 10/10ths of sky covered by cumulus clouds whose tops were 9200 feet. 5/10ths of the hour on instruments. Last direction finder bearing from Manila 101 degree.”
The radio operator at Panay acknowledged this message and indicated that he wised to transmit weather sequence reports based on observations complied at 0400 G. C. T. by the Philippine Stations and relayed to him in accordance with Company procedure. The radio operator on the Clipper replied as follows: “Stand by for one minute before sending as I am having trouble with rain static.”
The radio operator in Panay again called the Clipper at 0412 G. C. T., giving him the weather sequences. This message was not acknowledged. The radio operator at Panay continued calling the Clipper until 0415 G. C. T., at which time he sent the Clipper’s 0400 G. C. T. position report to Manila. At 0435 G. C. T., the Communications Superintendent, Pacific Division, Alameda, Calif., was notified of the failure of communication between ground stations and the Clipper. All Philippine stations were requested to stand by on emergency frequencies at 0449 G. C. T. This is standard emergency procedure whenever an interruption of communication happens between shore stations and the aircraft. Interruptions do occur from time to time and often there is no alarm, the emergency procedure is put into effect as a matter of routine.
At 0900 G.C.T. (5 P.M.) the Clipper was due at Manila. Up to that time, while some alarm had been felt, it was believed that she might be proceeding to her destination with the radio out of commission. As soon as she was eyes due, the Naval Commandant, at the request of Pan American airways, ordered all Navy vessels at Manila, to stand by for maneuvers. At 1030 G.C.T. (6:30 P. M.) all Navy vessels were ordered to refuel and prepare to put out to sea. At 1600 G.C.T. (midnight) 13 vessels were under way to begin a search for the missing aircraft.
The nearest surface vessel at the time was the United States Army Transport “Meigs”, which at 0411 G.C.T. was approximately 103 miles west-northwest of the Clipper’s last reported position and headed east. Upon receipt of a report that shore stations had lost contact with the Clipper, the *** altered her course at 0740 G.C.T. (3:40 P.M.) Manila Time, and produced to the Clipper’s last reported position, arriving in that vicinity at 1400 G.C.T., July 29 (10 P. M.) Manila Time.
A search was conducted in the vicinity for approximately three hours. Following that time, the search was conducted over various areas later that night, and the following day, in accordance with instructions from Pan American Airways. At 0910 G.C.T. (5:10 P.M.) Manila Time on July 30, on oil slick was discovered about 28 miles south-southeast of the Clipper’s last estimated position. This slick was variously estimated by officers of the Meigs to be from 500 to 1,500 feet in diameter and roughly circular in shape.
The area in the vicinity of the slick was carefully searched and a small boat was put over in charge of Second Officer J. A. Harrington, for the purpose of obtaining samples of oil from the slick. Due to the limited amount of time before darkness, only a small sample of oil was obtained. The Meigs remained have to during the night in the hope of being able to pick up the slick again in the morning. The log of the Meigs shows that at the point the slick was found, there was a current set of 140 degree at the rate of about one knot per hour. At daylight, on July 31, the Meigs attempted to relocate the slick on the theory that both the slick and the Meigs would have drifted approximately the same distance during the night. No sign of the slick was discovered and at 3:18 P.M., Manila Time, the Meigs set a course to return to the original position of the oil slick. Another search was made in that vicinity but not trace of oil was found.
Following that time, an intensive search over a large area of the ocean was conducted by the Meigs, Navy destroyers and submarines, and by army and Navy aircraft. Other surface vessels in that part of the Pacific lent their assistance. A search of the shores and interior areas of Luzon and Mindanao, and other smaller islands of the Philippines group, was conducted by Army bombers and Navy ambitions.
During the period of the search there was no surface winds reported over 6 to 8 miles per hour, and the sea was exceptionally calm. This condition was ideal for the search for small articles such as should have been floating on the surface, and the aircraft crashed in that area, or for oil, which, in the event of a crash, would have been released in large quantities.
The search was continued until August 5, at which time the searchers felt that every possible theory as to the location of the Hawaii Clipper had been exhausted, and the search was abandoned.
An employed of a telephone company, who lives on the Island of Lahuy, is reported to have heard a large airplane flying above the clouds about 3pm Manila Time, on July 29. As a result of this report, a careful aerial search was made of the Island of Lahuy and nearby areas. It was also ascertained that there were no army, Navy or private aircraft in that vicinity on that date.
Weather reporter from nearby Pan American Airways Stations indicate that at the time there was an overcast, with a ceiling of about 2,500 feet, and light rain.
Panay is a small island lying East of and close to the Southeastern tip of Luzon and is directly on the course from the Clipper’s last reported position to Manila. At normal cruising speed the Clipper should have reached that vicinity at approximately 3:46 P.M. (Manila Time). Luzon is the largest island in the Philippine group. The Southern part of Luzon and the larger islands in the vicinity, are moderately well settled. There are, however, large areas of tropical jungles and mountain ranges which rise to an altitude exceeding 7000.
The sample of oil obtained from the slick was placed in two less jars and delivered to the U.S.S. Paul Jones. One of the samples was tested for lead content in Manila. The result was negative. The residue of this sample and the untouched sample were sent to New York for complete analysis. The samples amount to less than 3 cc’s each, which made it impossible to analyze in the usual manner; however, an investigation of the properties of these samples was conducted by chemists who were selected for their ability in this particular kind of work. At the compilation of these test they were able to announce definitely that the oil recovered from the slick was not the type of oil used in the engines of the Hawaii Clipper.
The Meigs arrived in San Francisco while the Board was in session at that point and before the laboratory tests had been made. Tests were conducted in San Francisco Bay in the presence of officers of that vessel and officials of Pan American Airways Company in an effort to identify the oil in the slick. These tests consisted of dumping samples of various kinds of oil on the surface of the waters of the Bay under conditions that approximated as nearly as possible, those existing in the Pacific Ocean on July 30. As a result of these tests, the following facts were ascertained.
1) -Any oil dumped on the water produces a file of the same general appearance.
2) -The odor of high-test gasoline does not remain in an oil slick more than a few minutes. This was ascertained by drawing a cloth through the slick produced from the mixture of used engine oil and 87-octance gasoline. The film adhered to the cloth, but when drawn into the boat there was no noticeable odor of gasoline remaining, even after so short a time as five minutes. This fact is mentioned because the officers of the Meigs testified that a strong odor of gasoline was noticeable at the time they were obtaining samples of oil from the slick.
3) Since the officers of the Meigs had handled the sample obtained and had served its characteristics after it had been placed in two small glass jars, the following experiments were made: Small samples of various oils were placed in class jars. The jars were then filled with sea water and shaken up and the result was observed for characteristic beading, odor, color and tendency to emulsify. In the opinion of the observers, none of the oil so treated appeared to duplicate the appearance of characteristics of the oil taken from the slick. It was particularly noticeable that in the experiments made with samples of new and used engine oil, the color was found to be radically different from that of the oil taken from the slick. There was aboard the Clipper 120 gallons of engine oil and a variety of other oils in small quantities; therefore in the event of a crash, the engine oil would predominate.
1) The captain and members of the crown were qualified and physically fit.
2) Trip No. 229 progressed normally from Alameda to Guam. Inspections *** at Division points along the route show that the aircraft, engines *** were functioning properly.
3) The aircraft and its equipment were in an airworthy condition when it departed from Guam.
4) The flight was properly dispatched from Guam to Manila in accordance with regular Company procedure.
5) Radio conditions; i.e. atmospheric conditions, were unusual, and while communication with the plane was occasionally difficult, at no time during the trip from Alameda to Guam was communication lost. The flight from Guam west proceeded normally, and the radio equipment aboard continued to function satisfactorily until 0411 G.C.T. on July 29, 1938.
6) There was a failure of communication between the Clipper and shore stations immediately following 0441 G.C.T.
7) A wide-spread and intensive search by surface vessels and aircraft failed to disclose any evidence as to the whereabouts of the Clipper.
8) The chemical analysis of the oil sample obtained by the officers of the U. S. A.T. Meigs definitely establishes the fact that there is no connection between the oil slick discovered by then and the disappearance of the Clipper.
9) The report from the Island of Lahuy, that an aircraft was heard flying, in that vicinity above the clouds on the afternoon of July 29, cannot be ignored.
10) Due to the character of the terrain, the Board is not prepared to say that the aerial search of Iahuy and other areas in the island can be considered ad conclusive.
11) The reward offered by the Pan American Airways Company for information concerning the Clipper should stimulate the search by land, and may produce results.
12) In conclusion, it appears that the only definite facts established up to the present time, are that between 0411 and 0412 G.C.T on July 29, 1938 was a failure of communication between the ground and the Clippers; Communication was not thereafter reestablished; and that no trace of the flying boat has since been discovered. A number of theories have been advanced as to the possible basic cause of or reason for the disappearance of the Clipper. The Board has considered each of them. Some have not been disproved, either or have been contradicted by the known facts. However, the Investigating Board feels that this report cannot properly include a discussion of conjection unsupported by developed facts. The Board, therefore, respectfully submit this report with the thought that additional evidence may yet be discovered and the investigation completed at that time.
Robert D. Foyt – Chairman
Phil C. Salzman – Kemberly,
W.T. Miller – Member
Find more information, stories, photos and video clips here on The Lost Clipper Facebook page.
19 Comments Add yours
Has anyone gone to the foundation site and used ground penetrating radar to see if remains could be identified? Have inquiries been made through the “Freedom of Information Act”? What is the Erhart connection alluded to? BTW her old house is just down the street from where I live here in Florida. I’m retired and would be willing work as volunteer if there is any help I could provide. Glad to see this mystery has not been allowed to die.
I don’t know if Charlie ever published his book on Earhart or not. No one to my knowledge has ever had the slab analyzed and it would likely take a lot of money in bribes and equipment to do so if it still exists. The issue may as well be dead since those that could do something about it refuse to do so and mine and Charlie’s every effort has been stonewalled, perhaps because it would rock a diplomatic boat or two. The Freedom of Information Act would only reveal the official story, not the true one. I still have the newspaper describing how the Hawaii Clipper crashed at sea which is likely all you’d get, if that much. Those men deserved better from a government they honorably served and eventually, as it happens, died for…the families deserve better…but the truth of the matter is that our government doesn’t give a damn and if you shake the wrong tree something might fall on you, just as it did Charlie. If you haven’t already, go to Amazon and buy the book, it’s quite enlightening.
Ted, thanks for your post. We actually did bring a ground penetrating scanner on trip #2 but had no luck. On trip #3, we confirmed the actual suspect slab and with only a 24 hour widow, penetrated it with a team of eight diggers and one engineer and found evidence of a Japanese medical facility and western styled clothing remains. Time though was against us and the widow closed and had to shut the dig down. I’m convinced we are in the correct location but with no operating funds, the remains are were they were 70 + years ago.
Hello Jim and thanks for your message. After 15 years at this, I think we are merely yards from the finish line but without adequate funding, the goal remains allusive.
Guy- I had no idea anyone was looking as of the last I spoke to Charlie years ago we were trying to get JPAC to do something and there didn’t appear to be in movement in that direction.Were you anywhere near 7:22:32N 151:53:55E as per Charlie’s estimated location? It would be nice to know if Uncle Ted’s remains could be brought home.
Focusing on the statement by the “contractor” is there more information?
Charlie Hill, author of “Fix on the Rising Sun” told me that Ted Wyman (my namesake and great-uncle) and the other 14 were entombed, face down, (as per a report in 1964 by a contractor who worked for the Japanese on Truk), in the foundation slab of the small officers hospital or clinic that was built up on Unimakur Mountain on Dublon Island, Truk (today Chuuk State). The hospital in question is not the general navy hospital, but a small clinic-sized unit (just the slab remaining as of 1987) intended for officers, high above the mosquito line, and where a number of medical atrocities were committed during the war (a colonel-surgeon was hanged at Guam after the war). This clinic was the site of wartime medical atrocities and, after the war, the slab served as the base for a local jail. Several family members of the crew that made inquiries in trying to retrieve the remains were harrassed into silence by our government. Charlie himself told me that publishers who were at first willing to publish the book later became reluctant and refused, eventually he had to self publish. Charlie’s wife was told she was no longer employable at the university she worked at and their bank accounts were frozen for a period of time after he made further inquiries and open records requests. He told me when I asked who I should contact that,”Petitioning for recovery of the remains would best be made through CILHI, the Army’s Central Identification Laboratory Hawaii. My last contact there, in 2002, was Richard Huston, a civilian program director—who was initially interested, but then turned me down using some very obviously false logic. hings may change in the future, but I have been stonewalled since 1987—twenty years! The pattern is almost always the same: great interest at first, followed by silence, folowed by petulant or even angry rejection. The Earhart connection has made this a very sensitive subject. She was not a very nice person, after all.” My father loved his uncle and honored him to the degree that he named me after him and his son Cory, which gives me all the more interest in seeing justice done and the return of the remains of all the men entombed in that horrific grave. So far I have been stonewalled by JPAC and CILHI. I would recommend anyone with interest in this cover-up read “Fix on the Rising Sun” and form their own opinion.
LikeLiked by 2 people
how deep is the Pacific Ocean where the plane may have gone down? Has anyone tried using sonar to map the suspected area where the plane may have gone down?
Mark Walker, the First Officer on the plane, was my uncle. My mother, now deceased, talked a lot about this mysterious catastrophe many times when I was growing up in Texas. She was very close to her “big brother”. He was a Stanford graduate and a U.S. Navy pilot before joining Pan Am. Very handsome guy, popular, played polo, etc. etc. I think this tragedy was most likely a hijacking — of course, we will never know.
James T. Lee, M.D.
Saint Paul, MN
PS: On closer look, there is a tiny Panay Island per google maps off the north west coast of the Catanduanes. However, Jackson’s book, China Clipper, p. 184, notes KZDY at Panay in the central Philippines, which I guess would be Iloilo. Luzon is 42,458 square miles per wikipedia, Mindanao 36,657 square miles, Panay … ? … the third largest in the P’pines Have fun, and thanks for your website.
Thanks for your great comments. I happen to believe that the same folks that allegedly took the clipper were also involved in the sinking of the Panay… more to come soon!
Panay Island is the third largest island in the Philippines. Luzon is the largest. Mindanao is the second largest. Panay is not in the Catanduanes. Panay is in the Visayas, the multiple islands of the central Philippines, west of Cebu, east of Palawan. Iloilo is the largest city on Panay Island. A war once started over a U.S. navel ship, a river boat, the Panay, bombed, I think, in the Yangtze River ( I think it was the Yangtze) by the Japanese. I think it was in 1937, upstream from Nanking (maybe upstream from Shanghai) when the Japanese were bombing Nanking (or Shanghai). The Japanese apologized, and so, a war was not begun over the sinking of the Panay. I googled you reading a book, China Clipper, by Ronald W. Jackson, 1980, an historical novel. He thinks the Hawaii Clipper was pirated by the Japanese. I think you can utube the sinking of the U.S.S. (I think it was USS) Panay. A famous current day Philippine resort, Boracay Island, is off the northwest coast of Panay Island. Boracay is very nice, famous for its white sands.
My great grandfather was EE Wyman; we found some of his papers in the archives at the University of Miami, in Coral Gables, FL. We did not have much time to peruse the collection, but perhaps there may be information there? Thanks for all of your hard work.
Thanks SO much, I greatly appreciate your comment. If you have a moment, would you be so kind to describe what you found, could be something I missed.
I’m sorry for the delay in my reply; unfortunately for your search, most of what we found was just day-to-day correspondence from his time working for PanAm. But it was pretty incredible to find his signature among his papers! EE’s son passed away 10 years ago; his daughter still lives in California. It would be just amazing if we could bring him home. Thanks.
Hi there Margaret, thanks SO much for connecting with me, I owe you a phone call. So far, no response from any of the folks we spoke about and it just perplexes me. There is plenty here to dig thru, lets do it together. 🙂
Proud of you for sticking with this! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person